I am confused about the various
specifications for seismic applications. How can I know if I have the
right filler metal for the job?
Your confusion is understandable. The documents overseeing seismic applications are
ongoing and constantly revised. To fully
understand this issue, we need to go back to
1994, when an earthquake in Northridge,
Calif., caused devastating damage to buildings
in the area. This prompted the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
to fund a variety of investigations into
problems related to welded steel moment-frame connections. The resulting document,
“Recommended Specifications and Quality
Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic
Applications” (FEMA 353), dealt with
overall structural design, connection design
and details, materials, workmanship, and
inspection.
While the FEMA document was being
drafted, the American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC) and the American
Welding Society (AWS) began to evaluate
their respective specifications and codes to
incorporate the results of the FEMA studies.
The AISC publication focuses on the design
of structures intended to resist seismically
induced loads. The AWS document, AWS
D1.8/D1.8M, “Structural Welding Code-Seismic Supplement,” focuses on welding
procedures, materials testing, and inspection.
With lead-times of three to four years not
uncommon in the building construction
field, much of this specification, published
in 2005, is just coming into practice today.
For all work done under D1.8, filler
metals must meet the standard AWS
A5.XX requirements. Demand-critical
welds must also meet a minimum Charpy
V-notch requirement of 40 ft.-lbs. (54
joules) at 70 degrees F, and a minimum
strength level for both a high- and low-heat
input test per Annex A of the AWS
D1.8/D1.8M:2005 specification.
Filler metals must be capable of depositing
weld metal with a maximum diffusible
hydrogen content of 16 mL per 100 grams
of deposited weld metal after a minimum
exposure time of 72 hours at 80 degrees F / 80
percent relative humidity. When flux-cored
about your filler metal, contact the manufacturer to verify what testing has been done. ■
MICHAEL
OSTAFFE
Michael Ostaffe is vice president, product management
and development, filler metals, for ESAB Welding &
Cutting and is located at their Filler Metal
Manufacturing Center, 801 Wilson Ave., P.O. Box
517, Hanover, PA 17331.
filler metals are combined with different
flux-cored filler metals or filler metals
deposited by other processes, the resulting
combination must be checked to ensure that
the minimum required Charpy V-notch is
obtained and the welds meet the more
stringent requirements. This is known as
intermix testing.
Filler metal manufacturers diligently test
their products to ensure that they meet the
requirements of D1.8. If you have questions
Do you have a consumables
question for Michael?
Send your questions to:
Amanda Carlson, Associate Editor
Practical Welding Today
833 Featherstone Road
Rockford, IL 61107-6302
Fax: 815-484-7788
E-mail: amandac@thefabricator.com
Slip-on Abrasives
Save Time & Money
Shadow-free
satin finish –
up to a mirror polish
Double-sided
Deburring of Sheet
Metal up to .2" Thick
• Simple, one-step
operation
• 40, 60, 80 and 100
grit flap wheels
• 220 V or 440 V, 3-phase
Boa Pipe Sander is the
Handrail Polishing Solution
• Sand & polish steel, stainless steel
and aluminum
• Grind down
weld seams
• Sanding arm
snakes up to 270˚
around the radius
of the pipe –
rotate slightly for
full 360˚ coverage
• Easy replacement
of abrasive belts
Surface Finishing Solutions
1-800-700-5919 • www.csunitec.com
Enter reader service code 186451 at www.ffid.net
PRACTICAL WELDING TODAY 21
March/April 2009